if I am one of the animals that are listening
the speech, I thing that he gets a good point because it is true that the
humans are the only animal that don’t produce something but get all of the
thing that the other animals produce, not only that, we take the baby animals
to sell them and that is not good, why because they parent (animal parents)
they miss them so that’s bad because those kids never a dad ore a mom, in other
hand the products that my colleagues made like milk or eggs is there products
there are not for humans, other thig that I losing was that the humans are the
main enemy and that can be true or not, because humans give us food and
shelter, yes we work but we have to see the good things and the bad things, bad
thing: fiscal work, the humans take our freedom and the thing we made, good
things: they give us shelter and free food.
With that speech I don’t consider humans
like an enemy, more like something we need to change like the way they behave
with us and the way they make us do thing so that is the aspects to get better,
old major say that now animal in England knows what freedom is and that’s no
true because there are a lot of land that is property of the animals and they
are free. In conclusion it was a little exaggerated the speech, that’s my point
of view.
